465 vs 560 Ti

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 560 Ti
7.85
+14.1%

560 Ti outperforms 465 by 14% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking482522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.753.46
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF114GF100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 January 2011 (13 years old)31 May 2010 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $279
Current price$130 (0.5x MSRP)$15.99 (0.1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 465 has 98% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384352
CUDA coresno data352
Core clock speed822 MHz607 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt200 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate52.6726.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance1,263.4 gflops855.4 gflops
Compute performanceno data30x

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinTwo 6-pins
SLI optionsno data+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s102.6 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMITwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.85
+14.1%
GTX 465 6.88

560 Ti outperforms 465 by 14% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 Ti 3044
+14.2%
GTX 465 2665

560 Ti outperforms 465 by 14% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 560 Ti 10970
+17.4%
GTX 465 9346

560 Ti outperforms 465 by 17% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%
Full HD65
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Hitman 3 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Hitman 3 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Hitman 3 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and GTX 465 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 14.5% faster than GTX 465

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 560 Ti is 18.2% faster than GTX 465

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.85 6.88
Recency 25 January 2011 31 May 2010
Cost $249 $279
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 200 Watt

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 465 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 465

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 730 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.