Quadro RTX 8200 vs GeForce GTX 460M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking814not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.47no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF106GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1927552
Core clock speed675 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60708.0
Floating-point processing power0.5184 TFLOPS22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs32472
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API with Feature Level 12.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 260 Watt

GTX 460M has 420% lower power consumption.

RTX 8200, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460M and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
GeForce GTX 460M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 82 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460M or Quadro RTX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.