Radeon HD 8750A vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking700not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameN11E-GSMars
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)2 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed675 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 2 February 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

HD 8750A has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Radeon HD 8750A. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M SLI
GeForce GTX 460M SLI
AMD Radeon HD 8750A
Radeon HD 8750A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 460M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8750A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460M SLI or Radeon HD 8750A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.