Tegra 4i vs GeForce GTX 460
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 594 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.25 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.55 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | GF104 | Tegra 4 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 July 2010 (14 years ago) | 19 February 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 336 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 11 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 37.80 | 1.320 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.9072 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 24 | 2 |
| TMUs | 56 | 2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 210 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| HDCP | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | ES 3.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 July 2010 | 19 February 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 20 Watt |
Tegra 4i has an age advantage of 2 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 and Tegra 4i. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 is a desktop card while Tegra 4i is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
