Radeon HD 8670A vs GeForce GTX 460 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Sun
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 March 2011 (14 years ago)2 February 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336 ×2320
Core clock speed701 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate39.26 ×212.00
Floating-point processing power0.9415 TFLOPS ×20.384 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×28
TMUs56 ×220
L1 Cache448 KB80 KB
L2 Cache512 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length292 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s ×216 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 March 2011 2 February 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 45 Watt

HD 8670A has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 255.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 X2 and Radeon HD 8670A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 X2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8670A is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2
GeForce GTX 460 X2
AMD Radeon HD 8670A
Radeon HD 8670A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 X2 or Radeon HD 8670A, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.