Radeon Pro W6800X vs GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.02
Power efficiencyno data15.30
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF114Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2010 (15 years ago)3 August 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2883840
Core clock speed650 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2087 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate31.20500.9
Floating-point processing power0.7488 TFLOPS16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs48240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cache384 KB768 KB
L2 Cache384 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Apple MPX
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 November 2010 3 August 2021
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 460 SE v2 has 33% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6800X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 or Radeon Pro W6800X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.