Radeon Pro 5600M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.08
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date15 November 2010 (14 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2882560
Core clock speed650 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate31.20164.8
Floating-point processing power0.7488 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs48160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount768 MB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed850 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.6 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 November 2010 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Pro 5600M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 and Radeon Pro 5600M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 or Radeon Pro 5600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.