FirePro A300 vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking829not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.44no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF104Trinity GL
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336384
Core clock speed650 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speedno data905 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate36.4021.72
Floating-point processing power0.8736 TFLOPS0.695 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs5624
L1 Cache448 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed850 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth108.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 40 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

FirePro A300 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 460 OEM and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro A300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 OEM
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 460 OEM or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.