Radeon E6760 PCIe vs GeForce GTX 295

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	712	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.16	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	GT200B	Turks
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)	2 May 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$500	no data
Current price	$200 (0.4x MSRP)	no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	480
CUDA cores	480	no data
CUDA cores per GPU	240	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	45 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	92.2 billion/sec	14.40
Floating-point performance	2x 596.2 gflops	576.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	175 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	6-pin & 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	1 GB
Standard memory config per GPU	896 MB	no data
Memory bus width	896 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	3200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	223.8 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU	448 Bit	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVIHDMI	6x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)

128bit

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.0
OpenGL	2.1	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Recency	8 January 2009	2 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount	1792 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	289 Watt	45 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---