GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking818not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency0.78no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BGT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×216
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt40 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08 ×24.160
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPS ×20.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs28 ×24
TMUs80 ×28
L2 Cache224 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB ×2512 MB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s ×28 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 295 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount.

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 622.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 90 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 295 or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.