GeForce 405M vs GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking817not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.12no data
Power efficiency0.76no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BGT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)5 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×216
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt14 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08 ×24.848
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPS ×20.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs28 ×24
TMUs80 ×28
L2 Cache224 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB ×2Up to 512 MB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s ×225.6 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMIDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor support++
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x15362048x1536
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 API
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL2.14.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce 405M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1964.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 405M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 90 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 295 or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.