CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking819not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Power efficiency0.78no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480 ×24480
CUDA cores per GPU240no data
Core clock speed576 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)289 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate46.08 ×2394.8
Floating-point processing power0.5962 TFLOPS ×212.63 TFLOPS
ROPs28 ×2128
TMUs80 ×2280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cache224 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1792 MB ×216 GB
Standard memory config per GPU896 MBno data
Memory bus width896 Bit ×24096 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth223.8 GB/s ×21,493 GB/s
Memory interface width per GPU448 Bitno data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL2.1N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1792 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 289 Watt 250 Watt

CMP 170HX has an age advantage of 12 years, a 814% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 686% more advanced lithography process, and 16% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 295 and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 93 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 21 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 295 or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.