A40 PCIe vs GeForce GTX 295
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 818 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.12 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.76 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | GA102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 (16 years ago) | 5 October 2020 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 ×2 | 10752 |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 1305 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1755 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 28,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 46.08 ×2 | 589.7 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5962 TFLOPS ×2 | 37.74 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 28 ×2 | 112 |
| TMUs | 80 ×2 | 336 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 84 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 6 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB ×2 | 48 GB |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit ×2 | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1812 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s ×2 | 695.8 GB/s |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | no data |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Two Dual Link DVIHDMI | 3x DisplayPort |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2009 | 5 October 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 48 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 300 Watt |
GTX 295 has 3.8% lower power consumption.
A40 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 2642.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 295 and A40 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 295 is a desktop graphics card while A40 PCIe is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
