ATI Video Xpression+ vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking688not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.89no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXMach64
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)1 May 1996 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed576 MHz62 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million1 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
ROPsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3EDO
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data496.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10N/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 1 May 1996
Chip lithography 55 nm 600 nm

GTX 285M SLI has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 990.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Video Xpression+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook card while Video Xpression+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.