GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	407	641
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	1.63
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT	N10E-GTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	8 August 2016 (7 years old)	2 March 2009 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data
Current price	$95 (1.1x MSRP)	$149

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	256
Core clock speed	no data	576 MHz
Boost clock speed	1180 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1508 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.08	no data
Floating-point performance	2,115 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 460 Mobile and GeForce GTX 285M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	1020 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	10
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	no data	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−76.5%

60
+76.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+129%

7−8

−129%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +80%	14−16 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +177%	12−14 −177%
Hitman 3	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +100%	10−12 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +80%	14−16 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +177%	12−14 −177%
Hitman 3	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +100%	10−12 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30 +233%	9−10 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Battlefield 5	30−35 +183%	12−14 −183%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +213%	8−9 −213%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +177%	12−14 −177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +88.9%	9−10 −88.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 +260%	5−6 −260%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +114%	7−8 −114%
Hitman 3	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +85.7%	7−8 −85.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Hitman 3	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Battlefield 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%