ATI Radeon 7200 64 MB vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking761not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.96no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXR100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)1 April 2000 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed576 MHz166 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX107.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 285M SLI has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7200 64 MB, on the other hand, has 552% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon 7200 64 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7200 64 MB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Radeon 7200 64 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Radeon 7200 64 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.