ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 vs GeForce GTX 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking776not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.26no data
Power efficiency1.33no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGT200BM9+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 December 2008 (17 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$359 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2405
Core clock speed648 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate51.840.8
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s14.72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)128bitno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 December 2008 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm

GTX 285 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285 and Mobility Radeon 9200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon 9200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
GeForce GTX 285
ATI Mobility Radeon 9200
Mobility Radeon 9200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285 or Mobility Radeon 9200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.