RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 285 X2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 251 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 39.65 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | GA107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 June 2009 (16 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 ×2 | 2304 |
| Core clock speed | 648 MHz | 727 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1462 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 8,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 315 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 51.84 ×2 | 105.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7085 TFLOPS ×2 | 6.737 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 ×2 | 72 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 72 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 18 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 275 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB ×2 | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit ×2 | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1152 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.5 GB/s ×2 | 192.0 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 June 2009 | 16 April 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 315 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX A1000 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 530% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285 X2 and RTX A1000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
