ATI Radeon VE PCI vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXRage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed585 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million30 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX107.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE PCI, on the other hand, has 552% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon VE PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon VE PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or Radeon VE PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.