Radeon RX 5900 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.64no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed585 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1635 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data418.6
Floating-point processing powerno data13.39 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has 100% lower power consumption.

RX 5900, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and Radeon RX 5900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or Radeon RX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.