GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs GTX 280M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking777not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.61no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXTU104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)10 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561920
Core clock speed585 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rateno data201.6
Floating-point processing powerno data6.451 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 10 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 160 Watt

GTX 280M SLI has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 TU104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 280M SLI and GeForce RTX 2060 TU104. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 280M SLI is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
GeForce GTX 280M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 280M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 97 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 280M SLI or GeForce RTX 2060 TU104, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.