Radeon 520 OEM vs GeForce GTX 275

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	675	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.35	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GT200B	Banks
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	15 January 2009 (15 years ago)	18 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data
Current price	$82 (0.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	240	320
CUDA cores	240	no data
Core clock speed	633 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	50.6 billion/sec	20.60
Floating-point performance	673.9 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	448 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1134 MHz	4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	127.0 GB/s	36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Two Dual Link DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL	3.0	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1 (1.2)
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.170
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	15 January 2009	18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	219 Watt	50 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---