Radeon 550 vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated666
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.37
Power efficiencyno data7.82
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BLexa
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 February 2010 (15 years ago)20 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240512
Core clock speed633 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1183 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate50.6437.86
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs2816
TMUs8032
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cache224 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount896 MB2 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s56 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2010 20 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 550 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 338% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and Radeon 550. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
AMD Radeon 550
Radeon 550

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 36 votes

Rate Radeon 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition or Radeon 550, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.