GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs GTX 275 PhysX Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT200BG92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 February 2010 (15 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240128
Core clock speed633 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate50.6446.40
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs2816
TMUs8064
L2 Cache224 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB512 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.31.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2010 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 125 Watt

GTX 275 PhysX Edition has an age advantage of 1 year, a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

9800 GT Rebrand, on the other hand, has 75.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition or GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.