RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 260M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1175not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.08no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG92AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 March 2009 (16 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1123072
Core clock speed550 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors754 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate30.80139.7
Floating-point processing power0.308 TFLOPS8.94 TFLOPS
Gigaflops462no data
ROPs1648
TMUs5696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options2-way-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 950 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth61 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortSingle Link DVIDual Link DVIVGALVDSHDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
GeForce GTX 260M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 16 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M or RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.