Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking806not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.56no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXVega 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2243584
Core clock speed550 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data291.4
Floating-point processing powerno data9.326 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data409.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX Vega 56 Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.