Radeon Pro W6300M vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking814not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)19 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224768
Core clock speed550 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data97.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.133 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 25 Watt

Pro W6300M has an age advantage of 12 years, a 817% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Radeon Pro W6300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6300M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro W6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M SLI or Radeon Pro W6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.