Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking739not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.53no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXTU104B
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 March 2009 (15 years ago)8 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2243072
Core clock speed550 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rateno data296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data9.492 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 8 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 110 Watt

RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M SLI
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.