ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP vs GeForce GTX 260M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking814not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.57no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)no data
GPU code nameNB9E-GTXRage LT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 March 2009 (17 years ago)1 November 1997 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224no data
Core clock speed550 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million8 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.08
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 2x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data800 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX106.0
OpenGLno data1.1
OpenCLno dataNone
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 March 2009 1 November 1997
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 350 nm

GTX 260M SLI has an age advantage of 11 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 536.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and 3D Rage LT PRO AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a notebook graphics card while 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260M SLI or 3D Rage LT PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.