Radeon 530X Mobile vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGT200BPolaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 July 2008 (17 years ago)18 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed576 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8624.58
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs288
TMUs6424
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache224 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount896 MB2 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2008 18 April 2017
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 50 Watt

530X Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 264% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and Radeon 530X Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 530X Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon 530X Mobile
Radeon 530X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon 530X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or Radeon 530X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.