Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BGT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 July 2008 (17 years ago)11 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $1,799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed576 MHz602 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8638.53
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs2824
TMUs6464
L2 Cache224 KB192 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB1536 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2008 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 1536 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 150 Watt

FX 4800 Mac Edition has an age advantage of 3 months, a 71.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 21.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.