Matrox Productiva G100 vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)G100 (1998)
GPU code nameGT200BTwister
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 July 2008 (17 years ago)1998 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed576 MHz41 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Wattno data
Texture fill rate36.860.04
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPSno data
ROPs281
TMUs641
L2 Cache224 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length267 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SGR
Maximum RAM amount896 MB2 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s496.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)3.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 350 nm

GTX 260 Rev. 2 has a 44700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 536.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and Matrox Productiva G100. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Matrox Productiva G100
Productiva G100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 16 votes

Rate Matrox Productiva G100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or Matrox Productiva G100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.