GeForce 9200M vs GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G mGPU Intel 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9400M 9400M G G102M G205M ION

Contents

Share:
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1355
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGT200BC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 July 2008 (17 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speed576 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate36.863.600
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs284
TMUs648
L2 Cache224 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount896 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed999 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary

Recency 23 July 2008 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 260 Rev. 2 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 1416.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
R5 435 OEM Radeon R5 435 OEM
GeForce 9200M GeForce 9200M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 540v Mobility Radeon HD 540v
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
R7 360E Radeon R7 360E
9600 GS OEM GeForce 9600 GS OEM
vs
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT
9600 GS OEM GeForce 9600 GS OEM
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
GRID M60-4A GRID M60-4A
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
P102-100 P102 100
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3000 Max-Q RTX 3000 Max-Q
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 620 Radeon 620
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
Graphics 512SP Graphics 512SP
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
vs
540 Mobile Radeon 540 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.