ATI FirePro V3800 vs GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BRedwood
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 July 2008 (17 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $129

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192400
Core clock speed576 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)182 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8613.00
Floating-point processing power0.4769 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs288
TMUs6420
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache224 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount896 MB512 MB
Memory bus width448 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 July 2008 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 182 Watt 43 Watt

GTX 260 Rev. 2 has a 75% higher maximum VRAM amount.

ATI V3800, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 323.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 53 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.