Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GTX 260 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated602
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Power efficiencyno data11.48
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT200Cezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 December 2009 (16 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed518 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate33.1553.20
Floating-point processing power0.4147 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs288
TMUs6428
L2 Cache224 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1792 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1008 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 December 2009 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 OEM and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3205 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 OEM or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.