Radeon 740M vs GeForce GTX 260 216
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 582 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 12.41 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) |
| GPU code name | GT200 | Phoenix2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 September 2008 (17 years ago) | 31 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 216 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 20,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 182 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.47 | 44.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5365 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 28 | 8 |
| TMUs | 72 | 16 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 4 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 16 September 2008 | 31 January 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 182 Watt | 45 Watt |
Radeon 740M has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 304.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
