Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.10
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 November 2008 (17 years ago)8 December 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2161792
Core clock speed576 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2495 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rate41.47279.4
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS8.942 TFLOPS
ROPs2864
TMUs72112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache224 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mm190 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB8 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2008 8 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 132 Watt

RX 6600 LE has an age advantage of 15 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 29.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and Radeon RX 6600 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
Radeon RX 6600 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 38 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 or Radeon RX 6600 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.