Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BTahiti
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 November 2008 (16 years ago)31 January 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2161536
Core clock speed576 MHz925 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate41.4788.80
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS2.842 TFLOPS
ROPs2832
TMUs7296
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cache224 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount896 MB3 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s240.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2008 31 January 2012
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 185 Watt

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 has 8.2% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 242.9% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 or Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.