RTX A400 vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 398 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 21.96 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | GA107 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 216 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 727 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1762 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 8,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 171 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.47 | 42.29 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.5365 TFLOPS | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 28 | 16 |
| TMUs | 72 | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 6 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 November 2008 | 16 April 2024 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 171 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX A400 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 357.1% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 242% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
