Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.21
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT200BGP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date27 November 2008 (17 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2161792
Core clock speed576 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1404 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate41.47157.2
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS5.032 TFLOPS
ROPs2864
TMUs72112
L1 Cacheno data672 KB
L2 Cache224 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount896 MB6 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s168.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.36.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2008 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 75 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has an age advantage of 9 years, a 585.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 243.8% more advanced lithography process, and 128% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 27 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 or Quadro P3200 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.