P102-100 vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

Contents

Share:
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 216 Rev. 2
P102-100 P102-100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.80
Power efficiencyno data2.43
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT200BGP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 November 2008 (17 years ago)12 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2163200
Core clock speed576 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate41.47336.6
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs2880
TMUs72200
L1 Cacheno data1.2 MB
L2 Cache224 KB2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount896 MB5 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed999 MHz1376 MHz
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/s440.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.36.1

Pros & cons summary

Recency 27 November 2008 12 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 5 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 471.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and P102-100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while P102-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
R7 435 OEM Radeon R7 435 OEM
P102-100 P102 100
vs
Tesla K40m Tesla K40m
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
R7 360 896SP Radeon R7 360 896SP
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
FX 5900 XT GeForce FX 5900 XT
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
E9173 PCIe Radeon E9173 PCIe
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
E9174 MXM Radeon E9174 MXM
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GRID M60-2Q GRID M60-2Q
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2080 RTX 2080
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2080 Super RTX 2080 Super
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 3070 RTX 3070
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GRID RTX T10-2 GRID RTX T10-2
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 36 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.