HD Graphics P4000 vs GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
260 Core 216 Rev. 2 260 Rev. 2 275 275 PhysX Edition 285 285 Mac Edition 285 X2 295 295 Single PCB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6EU 2500 P4000

Contents

Share:
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GTX 260 216 Rev. 2
HD Graphics P4000 HD Graphics P4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1091
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.10
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BIvy Bridge GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 November 2008 (17 years ago)14 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores216128
Core clock speed576 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate41.4720.00
Floating-point processing power0.5365 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs281
TMUs7216
L2 Cache224 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount896 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed999 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth111.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.0
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary

Recency 27 November 2008 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 55 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 45 Watt

HD Graphics P4000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and HD Graphics P4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Intel HD Graphics P4000
HD Graphics P4000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
HD Graphics P4000 HD Graphics P4000
vs
GT 240 GeForce GT 240
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
R9 390 X2 Radeon R9 390 X2
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 950 Low Power 950 Low Power
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
550X 640SP Radeon 550X 640SP
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 512 480 Core 512
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
ATI DDR MAXX DDR MAXX
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
6100 + nForce 420 GeForce 6100 + nForce 420
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
HD Graphics P3000 Graphics P3000
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 1060 3 GB GP104 1060 3 GB GP104
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 110 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 or HD Graphics P4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.