Radeon PRO W9070 vs GeForce GTX 1660

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.52no data
Power efficiency17.97no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 March 2019 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14084096
Core clock speed1530 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate157.1760.3
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs88256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache1.4 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2001 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 304 Watt

GTX 1660 has 153% lower power consumption.

PRO W9070, on the other hand, has a 433% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 and Radeon PRO W9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W9070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6563 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 or Radeon PRO W9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.