Matrox Millennium G200 SD vs GeForce GTX 1660

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking183not rated
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.68no data
Power efficiency17.58no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameTU116Eclipse
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 March 2019 (5 years ago)1998 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.10.08
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPSno data
ROPs481
TMUs881

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2001 MHz112 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/s896.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 350 nm

GTX 1660 has a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 and Matrox Millennium G200 SD. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
Matrox Millennium G200 SD
Millennium G200 SD

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5238 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Millennium G200 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.