GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs 1660 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking147not rated
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.85no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTuring TU116GK110B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)10 September 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data
Current price$284 (1x MSRP)$1790

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15362304
Core clock speed1500 MHz863 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate169.9173.2
Floating-point performanceno data4,156 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.53.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 10 September 2013
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GTX 780 6 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6860 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.