GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking204not rated
Place by popularity45not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.96no data
Power efficiency19.50no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTU116GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616
Core clock speed1500 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate169.94.160
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs484
TMUs968
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.51.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 9285 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.