Radeon R7 M520 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 250 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 30.62 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 25.16 | no data |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | TU116 | Oland |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 (6 years ago) | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,600 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 152.6 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.884 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 48 | 8 |
| TMUs | 96 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | - |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 50 Watt |
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 2 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
R7 M520, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Radeon R7 M520. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 M520 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
