ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2501600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.37no data
Power efficiency25.04no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameTU116RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1455 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate152.60.96
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPSno data
ROPs484
TMUs964
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB64 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88no data
1440p58no data
4K35no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60no data
1440p3.95no data
4K6.54no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 147 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 86 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 74 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 111 no data
Counter-Strike 2 133 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 68 no data
Far Cry 5 93 no data
Fortnite 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 4 134 no data
Forza Horizon 5 100 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 62 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 no data
Valorant 209 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 103 no data
Counter-Strike 2 101 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 54 no data
Dota 2 121 no data
Far Cry 5 89 no data
Fortnite 120−130 no data
Forza Horizon 4 125 no data
Forza Horizon 5 90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 105 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 48 no data
Metro Exodus 54 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103 no data
Valorant 207 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 94 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data
Dota 2 116 no data
Far Cry 5 83 no data
Forza Horizon 4 99 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55 no data
Valorant 125 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 107 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 no data
Metro Exodus 30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 197 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 25 no data
Far Cry 5 60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 69 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 no data
Valorant 152 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10 no data
Dota 2 85 no data
Far Cry 5 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−33 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2019 1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1707 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 55 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.