AMD Juniper vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
26.34
+382%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Juniper by 382% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking186569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money30.12no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN18E-G0Juniper
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (4 years old)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$682 (3x MSRP)$23
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536800
Core clock speed1455 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate152.6no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Juniper compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed12000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
+394%
18−20
−394%
1440p58
+383%
12−14
−383%
4K35
+400%
7−8
−400%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 86
+438%
16−18
−438%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+400%
16−18
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+450%
12−14
−450%
Battlefield 5 111
+429%
21−24
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104
+395%
21−24
−395%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+386%
14−16
−386%
Far Cry 5 93
+417%
18−20
−417%
Far Cry New Dawn 88
+389%
18−20
−389%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+396%
27−30
−396%
Hitman 3 116
+383%
24−27
−383%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+450%
14−16
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Watch Dogs: Legion 82
+413%
16−18
−413%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+393%
14−16
−393%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+390%
10−11
−390%
Battlefield 5 103
+390%
21−24
−390%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 87
+383%
18−20
−383%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+440%
10−11
−440%
Far Cry 5 89
+394%
18−20
−394%
Far Cry New Dawn 85
+431%
16−18
−431%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+421%
24−27
−421%
Hitman 3 95
+428%
18−20
−428%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+442%
12−14
−442%
Metro Exodus 54
+440%
10−11
−440%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+421%
14−16
−421%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+390%
21−24
−390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+407%
14−16
−407%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+430%
10−11
−430%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+425%
8−9
−425%
Battlefield 5 94
+422%
18−20
−422%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+420%
10−11
−420%
Far Cry 5 83
+419%
16−18
−419%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
+443%
14−16
−443%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+450%
18−20
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+450%
10−11
−450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+450%
6−7
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 59
+392%
12−14
−392%
Hitman 3 59
+392%
12−14
−392%
Horizon Zero Dawn 43
+438%
8−9
−438%
Metro Exodus 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
+420%
5−6
−420%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+411%
9−10
−411%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+414%
7−8
−414%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Battlefield 5 69
+393%
14−16
−393%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+400%
5−6
−400%
Far Cry 5 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Far Cry New Dawn 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+475%
4−5
−475%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+450%
6−7
−450%
Hitman 3 31
+417%
6−7
−417%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+467%
3−4
−467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+400%
7−8
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Battlefield 5 38
+443%
7−8
−443%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+400%
2−3
−400%
Far Cry 5 31
+417%
6−7
−417%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
+433%
6−7
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+550%
2−3
−550%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Juniper compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 394% faster than Juniper

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 383% faster than Juniper

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 400% faster than Juniper

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.34 5.47
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Juniper in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while Juniper is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
AMD Juniper
Juniper

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1436 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 21 vote

Rate AMD Juniper on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.