Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07
+662%

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking148634
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.60no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTuring TU116Raphael
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)26 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408128
Core clock speed1530 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+662%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 4.34

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 662% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Super 21982
+626%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 3026

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 626% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Super 76654
+569%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 11455

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 569% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Super 15829
+592%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 2287

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 592% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Super 93241
+512%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 15247

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 512% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1660 Super 477037
+199%
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 159603

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by 199% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+374%
19
−374%
1440p54
+671%
7−8
−671%
4K30
+900%
3−4
−900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 76 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 63 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 121 no data
Forza Horizon 4 144 no data
Hitman 3 77 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 186 no data
Metro Exodus 144 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 163 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 83 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 72 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 52 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 86 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 63 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 290 no data
Metro Exodus 111 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 64 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 208 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 49 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 107 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 99 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 31 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 57 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 82 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34
+750%
4−5
−750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 26 no data
Far Cry 5 65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 84 no data
Hitman 3 43 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 71 no data
Metro Exodus 67 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+700%
10−11
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 31 no data
Hitman 3 25 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 11 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 54 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40 no data
Metro Exodus 35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28 no data

This is how GTX 1660 Super and Graphics (Ryzen 7000) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 374% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 671% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 4.34
Recency 29 October 2019 26 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17921 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 175 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.